pg.ddx.io  pgsql-sql@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
To: olly@lfix.co.uk
Cc: Theo Galanakis <Theo.Galanakis@lonelyplanet.com.au>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Isnumeric function?
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 10:48:01 -0700
Message-ID: <200409081048.01034.josh@agliodbs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1094664017.2014.80.camel@linda>
References: <82E30406384FFB44AFD1012BAB230B55037D056E@shiva.au.lpint.net>
	<200409080947.17682.josh@agliodbs.com>
	<1094664017.2014.80.camel@linda>

Theo, Oliver,

> Any reason why you don't like  ~ '^([0-9]?)+\.?[0-9]*$' ?

Yes, because it also matches "." , which is not a valid numeric value.

>  ~ '^([0-9]+|[0-9]+\\.[0-9]*|[0-9]*\\.[0-9]+)$'

Ah, the brute force approach ;-)

Actually, the above could be written:

~ '^([0-9]+)|([0-9]*\\.[0-9]+)$'

... though that still seems inelegant to me.  Is there a regex expert in the 
house?

-- 
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco



view thread (29+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <200409081048.01034.josh@agliodbs.com>
Permalink:  ../200409081048.01034.josh@agliodbs.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/200409081048.01034.josh@agliodbs.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
  Cc: josh@agliodbs.com, olly@lfix.co.uk, Theo.Galanakis@lonelyplanet.com.au
  Subject: Re: Isnumeric function?
  In-Reply-To: <200409081048.01034.josh@agliodbs.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox