From: Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org>
To: lmeadors@apache.org
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: getting back autonumber just inserted
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 14:57:25 -0600
Message-ID: <20050707205725.GA28200@winnie.fuhr.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a10a823c05070713473add03d7@mail.gmail.com>
References: <42CD6B58.6060508@techevolution.be>
<20050707201433.94901.qmail@web41013.mail.yahoo.com>
<20050707203715.GA26528@winnie.fuhr.org>
<a10a823c05070713473add03d7@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 02:47:23PM -0600, Larry Meadors wrote:
>
> If you have a trigger on your table that inserts a record in a table
> and shares the same sequence, what value do you get back, the
> triggered curval, or the currently inserted one?
That's a different issue than whether currval() is subject to
interference from other transactions. And just wait until PostgreSQL
8.1 comes out and people start using lastval() -- then it could get
*really* confusing which sequence value you're getting.
--
Michael Fuhr
http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: mike@fuhr.org, lmeadors@apache.org
Subject: Re: getting back autonumber just inserted
In-Reply-To: <20050707205725.GA28200@winnie.fuhr.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox