From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Kyle Bateman <kyle@actarg.com>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: bug in information_schema?
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 10:42:10 +0200
Message-ID: <200508011042.10990.peter_e@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <26942.1122736512@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <42EB0700.4040600@actarg.com>
<26942.1122736512@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Am Samstag, 30. Juli 2005 17:15 schrieb Tom Lane:
> The unconstrained join against pg_user is clearly unnecessary,
> and in fact I took it out a few days ago. I'm not sure whether the
> SELECT DISTINCT is still needed --- it might be, if there can be
> multiple pg_depend entries linking the same entities.
That would have been my guess, but it seems that even if a column or table is
used multiple times, a dependency is recorded only once, as it should be. It
might have been related to the duplicate pg_user mention.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: peter_e@gmx.net, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, kyle@actarg.com
Subject: Re: bug in information_schema?
In-Reply-To: <200508011042.10990.peter_e@gmx.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox