pg.ddx.io  pgsql-sql@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: Julian Scarfe <julian@avbrief.com>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Negative lookbehind assertions in regexs
Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2005 11:28:11 -0400
Message-ID: <20050903152811.GC7016@surnet.cl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <09d701c5b098$10afee50$0600a8c0@Wilbur>
References: <001a01c5ac84$496fc750$1102a8c0@dream>
	<008901c5ac9b$31bb8b50$0600a8c0@Wilbur>
	<20050829162103.GA32443@wolff.to>
	<09d701c5b098$10afee50$0600a8c0@Wilbur>

On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 03:59:18PM +0100, Julian Scarfe wrote:

> Any plans for a Perl Compatible Regular Expression operator? 
> http://www.pcre.org/

Why have Perl-Compatible things when you can have Perl itself?  Just use
plperl.

> Or are two regex operators enough?

Only two?  We have not only our own code, but also Perl's engine,
Python's, Tcl's, and PHP's, available through the PLs.  That's more than
enough, I'd say.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera -- Valdivia, Chile         Architect, www.EnterpriseDB.com
"I call it GNU/Linux. Except the GNU/ is silent." (Ben Reiter)



view thread (5+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20050903152811.GC7016@surnet.cl>
Permalink:  ../20050903152811.GC7016@surnet.cl/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20050903152811.GC7016@surnet.cl

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
  Cc: alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org, julian@avbrief.com
  Subject: Re: Negative lookbehind assertions in regexs
  In-Reply-To: <20050903152811.GC7016@surnet.cl>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox