pg.ddx.io  pgsql-sql@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jim C. Nasby <jnasby@pervasive.com>
To: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: fmiddleton@verizon.net
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Why doesn't the SERIAL data type automatically have a
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 17:52:50 -0500
Message-ID: <20051004225250.GN40138@pervasive.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1127835194.29347.12.camel@state.g2switchworks.com>
References: <4338961E.20100@verizon.net>
	<5899.1127782998@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<1127835194.29347.12.camel@state.g2switchworks.com>

On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 10:33:14AM -0500, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 20:03, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Ferindo Middleton Jr <fmiddleton@verizon.net> writes:
> > > Is there some reason why the SERIAL data type doesn't automatically have 
> > > a UNIQUE CONSTRAINT.
> > 
> > It used to, and then we decoupled it.  I don't think "I have no use for
> > one without the other" translates to an argument that no one has a use
> > for it ...
> 
> I have to admit, right after the change was made, I was of the opinion
> that no one would ever need that.  Then, a few months later, it was
> exactly what I needed for some project...  :)

Arguably it would have been better to make the default case add either
UNIQUE or PRIMARY KEY with a way to over-ride.

If newbies are getting burned maybe it would be useful to toss a NOTICE
or maybe even WARNING when a serial is created without a unique
constraint of some kind?
-- 
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461



view thread (10+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20051004225250.GN40138@pervasive.com>
Permalink:  ../20051004225250.GN40138@pervasive.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20051004225250.GN40138@pervasive.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
  Cc: jnasby@pervasive.com, smarlowe@g2switchworks.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, fmiddleton@verizon.net
  Subject: Re: Why doesn't the SERIAL data type automatically have a
  In-Reply-To: <20051004225250.GN40138@pervasive.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox