pg.ddx.io  pgsql-sql@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Muralidharan Ramakrishnan <contact2muraliin@yahoo.co.in>
To: Rick Schumeyer <rschumeyer@ieee.org>
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: question re. count, group by, and having
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 22:27:48 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <20051011212748.43240.qmail@web8606.mail.in.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000b01c5ce62$514db090$0300a8c0@dell8200>

Hi
 
  Logically HAVING is executed after the GROUP BY and it must contain only the columns in the GROUP BY or aggregated function. 
 
select state, count(state) as c from t group by state having c > 5 
 
The above query grouped only on state and HAVING can be used only with the column state or the aggregated function count(state).
 
Regards,
R.Muralidharan
  

Rick Schumeyer <rschumeyer@ieee.org> wrote:

The following query returns an error (“column c does not exist”) in pg 8.0.3:

 

(The column ‘state’ is the two letter abbreviation for a US state)

 

-- get the number of rows for each state; list in descending order; include only states with at least 6 rows

select state, count(state) as c from t group by state having c > 5 order by c desc; -- gives error

 

If I leave the having clause out, I get the expected results:

 

select state, count(state) as c from t group by state order by c desc; -- this works

 

Is this a bug or a feature?  I’m not sure why I can use ‘c’ in the order by clause but not the having clause.  pg is much happier with the full “having count(state) > 5”.  Will this cause count to be evaluated twice?

 

If it matters, state is varchar(2).

 

 

 


		
---------------------------------
 Yahoo! India Matrimony: Find your partner online.

view thread (4+ messages)

Message-ID: <20051011212748.43240.qmail@web8606.mail.in.yahoo.com>
Permalink:  ../20051011212748.43240.qmail@web8606.mail.in.yahoo.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20051011212748.43240.qmail@web8606.mail.in.yahoo.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
  Cc: contact2muraliin@yahoo.co.in, rschumeyer@ieee.org
  Subject: Re: question re. count, group by, and having
  In-Reply-To: <20051011212748.43240.qmail@web8606.mail.in.yahoo.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox