pg.ddx.io  pgsql-sql@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: elein <elein@varlena.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: elein <elein@varlena.com>
Cc: George Pavlov <gpavlov@mynewplace.com>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: "large" IN/NOT IN subqueries result in query returning wrong data
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:35:03 -0800
Message-ID: <20051228003503.GE20674@varlena.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9416.1135729540@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <CCB89282FCE1024EA3DCE687A96A5164039EBD13@ehost010-6.exch010.intermedia.net>
	<3697.1135712691@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<20051228001251.GB20674@varlena.com>
	<9416.1135729540@sss.pgh.pa.us>

On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 07:25:40PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> elein <elein@varlena.com> writes:
> > In 8.0 we get:
> 
> >    elein=# select 1 in (NULL, 1, 2);
> >     ?column?
> >    ----------
> >     t
> >    (1 row)
>    
> >    elein=# select 3 not in (NULL, 1, 2);
> >     ?column?
> >    ----------
>    
> >    (1 row)
>  
> > For consistency, either both should return NULL or
> > both return true/false.
> 
> The above behavior is correct per spec.  Feel free to argue its
> consistency with the SQL committee ;-)

Oh, no! Not the committee! 

> 
> Note that the above are not inverses because you changed the lefthand
> input.  You do get consistent results when you just add or omit NOT:
Yes, you are right. I skipped the permutations to get down to the point.

> 
> regression=# select 1 not in (NULL, 1, 2);
>  ?column?
> ----------
>  f
> (1 row)
> 
> regression=# select 3 in (NULL, 1, 2);
>  ?column?
> ----------
> 
> (1 row)
> 
> 			regards, tom lane

Thanks for your clarification.  

~elein
elein@varlena.com



view thread (8+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20051228003503.GE20674@varlena.com>
Permalink:  ../20051228003503.GE20674@varlena.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20051228003503.GE20674@varlena.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
  Cc: elein@varlena.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, gpavlov@mynewplace.com
  Subject: Re: "large" IN/NOT IN subqueries result in query returning wrong data
  In-Reply-To: <20051228003503.GE20674@varlena.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox