From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Help with trigger that updates a row prior to a potentially aborted deletion?
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 07:42:17 -0500
Message-ID: <20060303124217.GB7057@phlogiston.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060303001928.9C6B719B6A3@smtp03l.fasthosts.co.uk>
References: <20060302121943.GA7057@phlogiston.dyndns.org>
<20060303001928.9C6B719B6A3@smtp03l.fasthosts.co.uk>
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 12:19:22AM -0000, Simon Kinsella wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> I think I may have cracked this problem by combining a RULE ON DELETE which
> calls a function instead of the standard DELETE op. No triggers. It was a
Ah. Yes, likely. Yeah, you can't do that.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs@crankycanuck.ca
I remember when computers were frustrating because they *did* exactly what
you told them to. That actually seems sort of quaint now.
--J.D. Baldwin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: ajs@crankycanuck.ca
Subject: Re: Help with trigger that updates a row prior to a potentially aborted deletion?
In-Reply-To: <20060303124217.GB7057@phlogiston.dyndns.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox