From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Alternative to serial primary key
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 07:12:23 -0400
Message-ID: <20060706111223.GC26210@phlogiston.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44ACEFBF.7030903@logix-tt.com>
References: <12b7ac1e0607060316ub7b5e21i5e8e3bef2504e02c@mail.gmail.com>
<44ACEA1C.9030804@logix-tt.com>
<12b7ac1e0607060406r16d03f74mfa303eec9ab4821f@mail.gmail.com>
<44ACEFBF.7030903@logix-tt.com>
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 01:10:55PM +0200, Markus Schaber wrote:
> Then you'll have to use the re-check approach, like:
That sort of undermines the value of the calculated primary key,
though, doesn't it? He'd need the unique index for FK references,
which was the point, I thought.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs@crankycanuck.ca
The whole tendency of modern prose is away from concreteness.
--George Orwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: ajs@crankycanuck.ca
Subject: Re: Alternative to serial primary key
In-Reply-To: <20060706111223.GC26210@phlogiston.dyndns.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox