From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Alternative to serial primary key
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 07:18:56 -0400
Message-ID: <20060707111856.GG26210@phlogiston.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1152196912.13851.119.camel@state.g2switchworks.com>
References: <12b7ac1e0607060316ub7b5e21i5e8e3bef2504e02c@mail.gmail.com>
<1152196912.13851.119.camel@state.g2switchworks.com>
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 09:41:52AM -0500, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> Please note that there seemed to be a misunderstanding in a few
> responses that this gentleman had 100 columns to key.
Oh, yes, that wa certainly my understanding. I totally agree that
this is premature optimisation then.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs@crankycanuck.ca
Everything that happens in the world happens at some place.
--Jane Jacobs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: ajs@crankycanuck.ca
Subject: Re: Alternative to serial primary key
In-Reply-To: <20060707111856.GG26210@phlogiston.dyndns.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox