From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: MS-SQL<->Postgres sync
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 09:17:40 -0400
Message-ID: <20060711131740.GA7723@phlogiston.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1152556251.6540.14.camel@state.g2switchworks.com>
References: <WorldClient-F200607101127.AA27520002@stockwelldesigngroup.com>
<20060710162520.GA4590@phlogiston.dyndns.org>
<1152556251.6540.14.camel@state.g2switchworks.com>
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 01:30:51PM -0500, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> > (which means you have to deal with failures in one database and not
> > another). Is the idea that this is multi-master?
>
> I wonder if it would be possible to write a set of triggers for MSSQL
> that would allow you to run slony daemons that connected to it and a
> postgresql server and did replication. Just mad scientisting for a
> second.
Well, yes, but that's why I asked whether it's multimaster. Because
if so, it'll be at least tricky to do under Slony I.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs@crankycanuck.ca
Information security isn't a technological problem. It's an economics
problem.
--Bruce Schneier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: ajs@crankycanuck.ca
Subject: Re: MS-SQL<->Postgres sync
In-Reply-To: <20060711131740.GA7723@phlogiston.dyndns.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox