From: Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Multiple DB join
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 05:38:32 -0600
Message-ID: <20060815113832.GA99592@winnie.fuhr.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060815103624.GA21634@phlogiston.dyndns.org>
References: <44E0EA72.2090505@indiana.edu>
<20060815103624.GA21634@phlogiston.dyndns.org>
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 06:36:24AM -0400, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 05:26:10PM -0400, Sumeet Ambre wrote:
> > I have a database which consists of 20 million records and I've split up
> > the db into 6-7 dbs.
>
> You can do this (as someone suggested with dblink), but I'm wondering
> why the split? 20 million records isn't very big.
And why multiple databases instead of multiple schemas within the
same database? Or even all data in the same schema? Is there a
reason for the segregation?
--
Michael Fuhr
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: mike@fuhr.org, ajs@crankycanuck.ca
Subject: Re: Multiple DB join
In-Reply-To: <20060815113832.GA99592@winnie.fuhr.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox