pg.ddx.io  pgsql-sql@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aarni Ruuhimäki <aarni@kymi.com>
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: double precision vs. numeric
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:36:50 +0300
Message-ID: <200608241936.50752.aarni@kymi.com> (raw)

Hello,

Not sure if this is the right list to ask ...

I vaguely remember having seen a message 

' ... type double precision ... will be depreciated / unsupported in future 
releases ... '

or something like that somewhere. (?)

I have quite a few older dbs with tables that have one or more fields type 
double precision and have so far upgraded ok since 7.0.x (I now use numeric 
with appropriate precision and scale.)

Is there something to worry about when upgrading next time ? Start changing 
these to numeric perhaps ?

Running 8.0.2 at the moment.

Best regards to all,

Aarni
-- 
Aarni Ruuhimäki

**Kmail**
**Fedora Core Linux**



view thread (10+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <200608241936.50752.aarni@kymi.com>
Permalink:  ../200608241936.50752.aarni@kymi.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/200608241936.50752.aarni@kymi.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
  Cc: aarni@kymi.com
  Subject: Re: double precision vs. numeric
  In-Reply-To: <200608241936.50752.aarni@kymi.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox