From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Nocount and scope_identity()
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 13:18:08 -0500
Message-ID: <20070202181808.GG11505@phlogiston.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <136ED738BD4F1545B97E4AC06FF6370734C25B@DMSP-MSG-EVS01.mail.pvt>
References: <136ED738BD4F1545B97E4AC06FF6370734C25B@DMSP-MSG-EVS01.mail.pvt>
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 11:49:30AM -0600, Demel, Jeff wrote:
> So, I'm wondering if NOCOUNT is supported in Postgres at all. If it's
> not, what's the alternative? If it is, what is wrong with my syntax?
Not as far as I know. What's it supposed to do?
> I haven't gotten there yet, but I'm also wondering if the
> SCOPE_IDENTITY() method is going to work or not.
I doubt it. What does it do?
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs@crankycanuck.ca
This work was visionary and imaginative, and goes to show that visionary
and imaginative work need not end up well.
--Dennis Ritchie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: ajs@crankycanuck.ca
Subject: Re: Nocount and scope_identity()
In-Reply-To: <20070202181808.GG11505@phlogiston.dyndns.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox