From: A. Kretschmer <andreas.kretschmer@schollglas.com>
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: many 'OR' in WHERE-condition
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 14:20:16 +0200
Message-ID: <20070420122016.GF15322@a-kretschmer.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4628AB05.6000400@archonet.com>
References: <20070420051341.GA15322@a-kretschmer.de>
<46289E10.9060302@archonet.com>
<20070420112930.GE15322@a-kretschmer.de>
<4628AB05.6000400@archonet.com>
am Fri, dem 20.04.2007, um 12:59:01 +0100 mailte Richard Huxton folgendes:
> A. Kretschmer wrote:
> >
> >It's not my problem - i found it in a forum (german)
> >http://pg-forum.de/showthread.php?t=1332
> >
> >If the list contains up to 195 entrys -> up to 195 bitmap index scans
> >and BitmapOr -> 7.839ms
> >
> >If the list contains 196 entrys -> seq-scan -> 5591.567ms
>
> It looks like it's getting the row estimate badly wrong.
>
> "Seq Scan on t_datasets_searchindices_rel (cost=0.00..129053.50
> rows=159277 width=4) (actual time=0.213..5590.435 rows=325 loops=1)
Uh oh, i have overlook this.
>
> Probably worth increasing the statistics estimate for that column (ALTER
> TABLE ... ALTER COLUMN ... SET STATISTICS=N)
Thx for your hints!
Andreas
--
Andreas Kretschmer
Kontakt: Heynitz: 035242/47150, D1: 0160/7141639 (mehr: -> Header)
GnuPG-ID: 0x3FFF606C, privat 0x7F4584DA http://wwwkeys.de.pgp.net
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: andreas.kretschmer@schollglas.com
Subject: Re: many 'OR' in WHERE-condition
In-Reply-To: <20070420122016.GF15322@a-kretschmer.de>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox