pg.ddx.io  pgsql-sql@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gary Stainburn <gary.stainburn@ringways.co.uk>
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: select slows from 3 seconds to 30 seconds
Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 11:08:18 +0100
Message-ID: <200705081108.18881.gary.stainburn@ringways.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <12822.1178326627@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <200705041649.54193.gary.stainburn@ringways.co.uk>
	<12822.1178326627@sss.pgh.pa.us>

On Saturday 05 May 2007 01:57, Tom Lane wrote:
> Gary Stainburn <gary.stainburn@ringways.co.uk> writes:
> > I have the query below which when run takes approx 3 seconds.  However
> > when I add the condition 'and w_ws_id = 10' onto the end changes to 30+
> > seconds. Can anyone see why? I've included the explain for the long
> > select.
>
> You really ought to provide EXPLAIN ANALYZE output for both versions if
> you want intelligent commentary --- otherwise we're just guessing.
>
> But I would guess the problem is that the planner is way off about the
>
> number of rows satisfying the joint condition --- it thinks two:
> >                            ->  Index Scan using walon_hide_index on walon
> >  (cost=0.00..85.04 rows=2 width=140) Index Cond: (w_hide = 0)
> >                                  Filter: (w_ws_id = 10)
>
> This plan is good if there really are only a couple rows, but degrades
> quickly if there are many...
>
> 			regards, tom lane

Thanks Tom

I'll bear that in mind in future.

The problem was fixed by running a 'vacuum analyse' so it looks like the 
planner was getting confused.

Gary


-- 
Gary Stainburn
 
This email does not contain private or confidential material as it
may be snooped on by interested government parties for unknown
and undisclosed purposes - Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, 2000     



view thread (3+ messages)

Message-ID: <200705081108.18881.gary.stainburn@ringways.co.uk>
Permalink:  ../200705081108.18881.gary.stainburn@ringways.co.uk/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/200705081108.18881.gary.stainburn@ringways.co.uk

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
  Cc: gary.stainburn@ringways.co.uk
  Subject: Re: select slows from 3 seconds to 30 seconds
  In-Reply-To: <200705081108.18881.gary.stainburn@ringways.co.uk>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox