From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Cheers for DISTINCT ON
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 11:18:12 -0500
Message-ID: <20080107161812.GS18581@crankycanuck.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b6e8f2e80801070802n7b04b0e3lbbec1d284bef1f9f@mail.gmail.com>
References: <b6e8f2e80801070802n7b04b0e3lbbec1d284bef1f9f@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 05:02:27PM +0100, Peter Kovacs wrote:
> I just wanted to give my cheers for DISTINCT ON. It is a great
> feature, I've just found a really good use for it. I am just wondering
> why it didn't make it into the standards.
Likely because neither Oracle Corp nor IBM nor (at the time, I guess) Sybase
had an implementation they were willing to spend enough time promoting.
> wondering ever since why the worse so often gets the upper-hand over
> the better. (I am obviously having a hard time "growing-up" :-) )
There is a long history in the computing literature on this, but the best
explanation is probably still Richard Gabriel's 'The Rise of "Worse is
Better"': <http://www.jwz.org/doc/worse-is-better.html;. Note that Gabriel
himself is of two minds about that paper:
<http://www.dreamsongs.com/WorseIsBetter.html;. I still think it's worth
reading. Just about everything I've ever written or said turned out to be
wrong in some sense, but it was still usually the result of the best
argument I could make at the time.
A
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: ajs@crankycanuck.ca
Subject: Re: Cheers for DISTINCT ON
In-Reply-To: <20080107161812.GS18581@crankycanuck.ca>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox