From: Andreas Kretschmer <akretschmer@spamfence.net>
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Simple way to get missing number
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:06:21 +0200
Message-ID: <20120424160621.GA14023@tux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201204242059.40709.raju@linux-delhi.org>
References: <4F96B57E.8080306@encs.concordia.ca>
<20120424143655.GA7501@tux>
<201204242059.40709.raju@linux-delhi.org>
Raj Mathur (राज माथुर) <raju@linux-delhi.org> wrote:
>
> Nice one, but curious about how would this perform if the numbers in
> question extended into 7 figures or more?
<mode=David Fetter>
TIAS
(Try It And See)
</mode>
Andreas
--
Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely
unintentional side effect. (Linus Torvalds)
"If I was god, I would recompile penguin with --enable-fly." (unknown)
Kaufbach, Saxony, Germany, Europe. N 51.05082°, E 13.56889°
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: akretschmer@spamfence.net
Subject: Re: Simple way to get missing number
In-Reply-To: <20120424160621.GA14023@tux>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox