From: Wolfgang Keller <feliphil@gmx.net>
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Correct implementation of 1:n relationship with n>0?
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 20:25:42 +0200
Message-ID: <20130430202542.a68c8042be92943866afa16c@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3724312.iEkiItIUeG@smadev.internal.net>
References: <20130430163905.77d43412c0176c3d9ebd8d90@gmx.net>
<3724312.iEkiItIUeG@smadev.internal.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-sql>
> (there is nothing wrong in getting your hands dirty with pl/pgsql btw)
The point is that I would have expected that problem to be solved
within the past four decades since relational databases have been
invented. Or at least in the past two decades since PostgreSQL has been
developed.
>;->
After all, this should be really an ultra-classic-standard FAQ item.
I'm definitely not the first database user in the world who needs to
have a 1:n relationship with n>0 and integrity enforced by the
database.
Sincerely,
Wolfgang
--
Sent via pgsql-sql mailing list (pgsql-sql@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-sql
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: feliphil@gmx.net
Subject: Re: Correct implementation of 1:n relationship with n>0?
In-Reply-To: <20130430202542.a68c8042be92943866afa16c@gmx.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox