From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Steven M. Wheeler <swheeler@sabre.com>
Cc: pgsql-sql@hub.org
Subject: Re: [SQL] Questions about vacuum analyze
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 1999 17:42:28 -0400
Message-ID: <20576.938814148@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <37F50FD3.F269B020@sabre.com>
"Steven M. Wheeler" <swheeler@sabre.com> writes:
> DB: version 6.5
> 33 hours [to vacuum] - WOW!
Yipes. We did find and fix a glitch in memory allocation in vacuum
(causing both slowness and excessive memory usage) between 6.5 and
6.5.2. You might try updating to see if it's gotten any better...
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, swheeler@sabre.com, pgsql-sql@hub.org
Subject: Re: [SQL] Questions about vacuum analyze
In-Reply-To: <20576.938814148@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox