From: rawi <only4com@web.de>
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Thank you all for your help...
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 00:41:04 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <25504364.post@talk.nabble.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <25490498.post@talk.nabble.com>
References: <25490498.post@talk.nabble.com>
I appreciate very much your opinions. They'll help me to adjust my approach
to this problem.
As I meant, it wouldn't be "cool" to have hibernate hoarding 50 ids, I
didn't mean the id-gaps and id-loss, that's no problem, but also to lose the
timely clear id alignment in the case of parallel access of the database
with another application... Sure, I'll have timestamps vor that, but... :)
Finally I'll go - certainly - with one sequence per PK.
Thanks
Kind regards, Rawi
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Hibernate%2C-web-application-and-only-one-sequence-for-all-primary-keys-tp2549...
Sent from the PostgreSQL - sql mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: only4com@web.de
Subject: Re: Thank you all for your help...
In-Reply-To: <25504364.post@talk.nabble.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox