From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: ow <oneway_111@yahoo.com>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: 7.4 - FK constraint performance
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 20:10:36 -0500
Message-ID: <25808.1076634636@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040213010341.95282.qmail@web60801.mail.yahoo.com>
References: <20040213010341.95282.qmail@web60801.mail.yahoo.com>
ow <oneway_111@yahoo.com> writes:
> Sounds pretty bad for my case. Any way to avoid the 10% scan?
Can't see how we optimize your case without pessimizing more-common cases.
Sorry.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, oneway_111@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: 7.4 - FK constraint performance
In-Reply-To: <25808.1076634636@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox