pg.ddx.io  pgsql-sql@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>
Cc: Tomasz Myrta <jasiek@klaster.net>
Cc: Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>
Cc: Ries van Twisk <ries@jongert.nl>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: To use a VIEW or not to use a View.....
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 20:01:20 -0500
Message-ID: <25948.1043283680@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030122164324.K4204-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com>
References: <20030122164324.K4204-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com>

Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com> writes:
> On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com> writes:
>>> The filter is applied only to a.  So, if you really wanted the
>>> c.a=3 condition to be applied for whatever reason you're out of
>>> luck.
>> 
>> FWIW, CVS tip is brighter: the condition does propagate to both relations.

> Yeah.  I was going to ask how hard you thought it would be to do for
> this particular sort of case.  I thought about the simple case of using
> and realized it'd probably be reasonable in amount of work, but it seems
> I don't have to think about it. :)

It could still use more eyeballs looking at it.  One thing I'm concerned
about is whether the extra (derived) conditions lead to double-counting
restrictivity and thus underestimating the number of result rows.  I
haven't had time to really test that, but I suspect there may be a problem.

			regards, tom lane



view thread (23+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <25948.1043283680@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../25948.1043283680@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/25948.1043283680@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com, jasiek@klaster.net, JanWieck@Yahoo.com, ries@jongert.nl
  Subject: Re: To use a VIEW or not to use a View.....
  In-Reply-To: <25948.1043283680@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox