From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Tambet Matiisen <t.matiisen@aprote.ee>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: calling function from rule
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 10:30:00 -0500
Message-ID: <26021.1043335800@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <81132473206F3A46A72BD6116E1A06AE1B14CB@black.aprote.com>
References: <81132473206F3A46A72BD6116E1A06AE1B14CB@black.aprote.com>
"Tambet Matiisen" <t.matiisen@aprote.ee> writes:
> I have a view and update rule on it, which updates another table. Now I would like to call a function, after update of the table is done. Also the function must be called in the same transaction as update. I tried to define an additional update rule on the view, but doing a SELECT in update rule spoils the affected records count:
Try 7.3, we changed the rules about returned records count.
http://www.ca.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/7.3/postgres/rules-status.html
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, t.matiisen@aprote.ee
Subject: Re: calling function from rule
In-Reply-To: <26021.1043335800@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox