pg.ddx.io  pgsql-sql@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: John Proctor <jproctor@prium.net>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: 16 parameter limit
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2002 13:21:41 -0500
Message-ID: <26072.1018030901@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <web-1050295@davinci.ethosmedia.com>
References: <web-1050295@davinci.ethosmedia.com>

"Josh Berkus" <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> Personally, as a heavy user of PL/pgSQL procedures, I'm not sure you
>  need to increase the *default* number of parameters.  Postgres just
>  needs to implement a parameter number change as part of a documented
>  command-line compile-time option, i.e. "--with-parameters=32".

I would not object to providing such a configure option; it seems a
reasonable thing to do.  But the real debate here seems to be what
the default should be.  The ACS people would like their code to run
on a "stock" Postgres installation, so they've been lobbying to change
the default, not just to make it fractionally easier to build a
non-default configuration.

> Also, what is the practical maximum number of parameters?

If you tried to make it more than perhaps 500, you'd start to see
index-tuple-too-big failures in the pg_proc indexes.  Realistically,
though, I can't see people calling procedures with hundreds of
positionally-specified parameters --- such code would be unmanageably
error-prone.

I was surprised that people were dissatisfied with 16 (it was 8 not very
long ago...).  Needing more strikes me as a symptom of either bad coding
practices or missing features of other sorts.

			regards, tom lane



view thread (43+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <26072.1018030901@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../26072.1018030901@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/26072.1018030901@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, josh@agliodbs.com, pgman@candle.pha.pa.us, jproctor@prium.net
  Subject: Re: 16 parameter limit
  In-Reply-To: <26072.1018030901@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox