From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Jeff Boes <jboes@nexcerpt.com>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Performance on temp table inserts
Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 00:51:46 -0400
Message-ID: <26320.1053406306@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <baba9i$2vi8$1@news.hub.org>
References: <baba9i$2vi8$1@news.hub.org>
Jeff Boes <jboes@nexcerpt.com> writes:
> What factors affect the performance of a temp table insert?
PG version would have a lot to do with that, considering how we've
whacked around the temp-table implementation in the last few releases.
> Hardware, O/S and PostgreSQL versions are all identical.
And they are?
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, jboes@nexcerpt.com
Subject: Re: Performance on temp table inserts
In-Reply-To: <26320.1053406306@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox