From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>
Cc: Chris Gamache <cgg007@yahoo.com>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Using VIEW to simplify code...
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 18:15:30 -0500
Message-ID: <26637.1037747730@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021119145457.Y71165-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com>
References: <20021119145457.Y71165-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com>
Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com> writes:
> On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Chris Gamache wrote:
>> Understood. PostgreSQL 7.2.3.
> 7.3 will be better for this. There were questions about the safety
> of pushing clauses down in queries with union and intersect and
> earlier versions wouldn't push down because we weren't sure it was
> safe. Except will still be problematic, but union and intersect should be
> much happier.
Yeah, the UNIONs in the view are definitely the big problem. Can you
try on 7.3rc1 and see how it goes?
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com, cgg007@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: Using VIEW to simplify code...
In-Reply-To: <26637.1037747730@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox