From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Kyle Bateman <kyle@actarg.com>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: clock command regression in pltcl?
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 21:17:09 -0500
Message-ID: <26884.1264385829@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B5A7E04.8030905@actarg.com>
References: <4B5A7E04.8030905@actarg.com>
Kyle Bateman <kyle@actarg.com> writes:
> Is this a regression or is there a reason the clock command is no longer
> accessible?
And the answer is ... it's an underdocumented implementation change
in Tcl's "clock" command. You can find the explanation and patch at
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2010-01/msg00369.php
Or, if you just need a quick workaround, use pltclu.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, kyle@actarg.com
Subject: Re: clock command regression in pltcl?
In-Reply-To: <26884.1264385829@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox