From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: dave.bath@unix.net
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: why vacuum
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 03:00:24 -0400
Message-ID: <2827.1130310024@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200510261622.40874.dave.bath@unix.net>
References: <200510261015.17623.lawgon@thenilgiris.com>
<2123.1130303680@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<200510261622.40874.dave.bath@unix.net>
"Bath, David" <dave.bath@unix.net> writes:
> ... Note that Sybase/MS-SQL's
> check constraint model asserts the constraint BEFORE the trigger, which
> discourages you from attempting to check and handle meaning of data!
Er, doesn't PG do it that way too?
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, dave.bath@unix.net
Subject: Re: why vacuum
In-Reply-To: <2827.1130310024@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox