pg.ddx.io  pgsql-sql@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Radu-Adrian Popescu <radu.popescu@aldratech.com>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: SQL function parse error ?
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 09:48:14 -0500
Message-ID: <29440.1042123694@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <00a501c2b7dc$a5c626b0$0600a8c0@rpopescu>
References: <008f01c2b7d0$3733fdf0$0600a8c0@rpopescu>
	<3E1D6362.80701@klaster.net>
	<00a501c2b7dc$a5c626b0$0600a8c0@rpopescu>

"Radu-Adrian Popescu" <radu.popescu@aldratech.com> writes:
> This is SQL, and people who are using PostgreSql write SQL, not
> whitespace-sensitive SQL, bash or whatever.

Nonsense.  SQL syntax is space-sensitive.  Or have you successfully
written
	SELECTXFROMY;
lately?

There has occasionally been talk of disallowing '$' as a valid character
in operator names, which would eliminate the syntactic ambiguity in this
example.  But undoubtedly it would also break a few applications that
use '$' in user-defined operator names, so the proposal hasn't passed
to date.

> Is there any operator named >$ ?

Whether there is one in the standard distribution is quite irrelevant.
It's a valid operator name according to the current rules, and so open
to definition by anyone who wants to.

The most recent discussion I can find about this is the pgsql-hackers
thread "Dollar in identifiers" from Aug 2001, eg
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2001-08/msg00629.php
There didn't seem to be a consensus to change things, so the old
behavior stands, for the moment.

			regards, tom lane



view thread (19+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <29440.1042123694@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../29440.1042123694@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/29440.1042123694@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, radu.popescu@aldratech.com
  Subject: Re: SQL function parse error ?
  In-Reply-To: <29440.1042123694@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox