agora inbox for pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Jürgen Purtz <juergen@purtz.de>
Cc: pgsql-sql@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: SQL conformity regarding SQLSTATE
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 10:30:14 -0500
Message-ID: <31999.1513697414@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c2c1a96d-dae9-6667-bf11-eb423ee90385@purtz.de>
References: <c2c1a96d-dae9-6667-bf11-eb423ee90385@purtz.de>
=?UTF-8?Q?J=c3=bcrgen_Purtz?= <juergen@purtz.de> writes:
> SQLSTATE is defined by the SQL standard. Our usage of the value seems to
> contain some defects in respect to it:
There are various SQLSTATE codes that we borrowed from DB2 and other
RDBMSes; to the extent that those violate the spec, we're in good
company.
> Here is a list of values, which violate the above rule as the values are
> in the range which is reserved for the standard but (actually) are not
> defined by the standard. I compared our list in the version 10
> documentation with the SQL:2011 standard. (Unfortunately I have no
> access to SQL:2016. Maybe, some values of my list are defined there.)
> 01008, 03000, 0B000, 23502 - 23514, 39001, 42501 - 42939, F0000, F0001.
Actually, I'm pretty sure we were looking at SQL99 when we made our
original list. I see 01008, 03000, 0B000, and 39001 there; are they
really not in later specs?
The 23xxx and 42xxx codes are there because SQL99 provides ridiculously
few subclasses for those classes. I think many of those might've been
borrowed from DB2, but in any case they're in the legal range for
extension subclasses, so I don't follow your complaint.
Class F0 seems like a mistake ... maybe we could get away with changing
those two assignments, since it seems unlikely that any client code is
looking for those values.
> b) Shall we add a comment into 'errcodes.txt' to remind everybody to the
> mentioned rule?
You mean the one at lines 64ff?
> c) Is it possible to rearrange the rows of 'errcode.txt' in a way that
> reflects the natural sort order of SQLSTATE?
I'd have said it was already.
regards, tom lane
view thread (8+ messages) latest in thread
Message-ID: <31999.1513697414@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink: ../31999.1513697414@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on: postgresql.org/message-id/31999.1513697414@sss.pgh.pa.us
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, juergen@purtz.de, pgsql-sql@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: SQL conformity regarding SQLSTATE
In-Reply-To: <31999.1513697414@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox