pg.ddx.io  pgsql-sql@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: josh@agliodbs.com
Cc: Ludwig Lim <lud_nowhere_man@yahoo.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Mailing List <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: plpgsql cursors : dynamic or static?
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 14:56:48 -0400
Message-ID: <3204.1035399408@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200210231121.00113.josh@agliodbs.com>
References: <20021023172118.20960.qmail@web80312.mail.yahoo.com>
	<200210231121.00113.josh@agliodbs.com>

Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
>> Are cursors in plpgsql dynamic or static?
>> 
>> FOR rec in   SELECT f1,f2 
>> FROM table1 WHERE .... LOOP
>> 
>> /* some codes that manipulate table1 */
>> END LOOP;

> Technically speaking, that is not a cursor, even though it serves the same 
> purpose.

> I'm pretty sure it's static, but it would be easy to test ... why don't you 
> give it a try?

The result definitely will be static in 7.3.  I'm not entirely sure
about prior releases: we used to manipulate the current-command counter
in a different way.

			regards, tom lane



view thread (3+ messages)

Message-ID: <3204.1035399408@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../3204.1035399408@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/3204.1035399408@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, josh@agliodbs.com, lud_nowhere_man@yahoo.com
  Subject: Re: plpgsql cursors : dynamic or static?
  In-Reply-To: <3204.1035399408@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox