From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Achilleus Mantzios <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: After Trigger assignment to NEW
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 11:06:02 -0500
Message-ID: <3649.1140797162@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0602241831280.19738-100000@matrix.gatewaynet.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0602241831280.19738-100000@matrix.gatewaynet.com>
Achilleus Mantzios <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com> writes:
> Is there a reason that the NEW values should remain unchanged in AFTER
> row triggers?
By definition, an AFTER trigger is too late to change what was stored.
Use a BEFORE trigger.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com
Subject: Re: After Trigger assignment to NEW
In-Reply-To: <3649.1140797162@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox