pg.ddx.io  pgsql-sql@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Barry Lind <barry@xythos.com>
To: Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Christoph Haller <ch@rodos.fzk.de>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Efficient DELETE Strategies
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 17:25:19 -0700
Message-ID: <3D05436F.5040008@xythos.com> (raw)
References: <200206101142.NAA16854@rodos>
	<5619.1023717387@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<1023730428.4092.64.camel@taru.tm.ee>

This

Hannu Krosing wrote:
> DELETE relation_expr FROM relation_expr [ , table_ref [ , ... ] ]
>  	[ WHERE bool_expr ]


This in some ways is similar to Oracle where the FROM is optional in a 
DELETE (ie. DELETE foo WHERE ...).  By omitting the first FROM, the 
syntax ends up mirroring the UPDATE case:

DELETE foo FROM bar WHERE ...

UPDATE foo FROM bar WHERE ...

However I think the syntax should also support the first FROM as being 
optional (even though it looks confusing):

DELETE FROM foo FROM bar WHERE ...

thanks,
--Barry




view thread (21+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <3D05436F.5040008@xythos.com>
Permalink:  ../3D05436F.5040008@xythos.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/3D05436F.5040008@xythos.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
  Cc: barry@xythos.com, hannu@tm.ee, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, ch@rodos.fzk.de, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Efficient DELETE Strategies
  In-Reply-To: <3D05436F.5040008@xythos.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox