pg.ddx.io  pgsql-sql@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gunther Schadow <gunther@aurora.regenstrief.org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Possibility of Index-Only access in PostgreSQL?
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 10:19:05 -0500
Message-ID: <3D1B2CE9.3080709@aurora.regenstrief.org> (raw)
References: <3D19FFCF.8030800@aurora.regenstrief.org>
	<16546.1025132344@sss.pgh.pa.us>

Tom Lane wrote:

> It won't happen.  See the many, many prior discussions of this point in
> the archives.


Hmm, I searched the archives both in my local mailbox and on Google,
could you give me some pointer to a relevant thread? I certainly
want to learn from past discussions.

So, it's that MVCC issue? I will then pursue distributing indexes
and tables over more spindles and will also consider CLUSTERing the
table (although that's difficult for two *different* use cases I
have.)

However, when everything is said and done, the "it won't happen"
still sounds frightening to me. It puts PostgreSQL at a BIG disadvantage,
limiting it to 150 records per second random access ceiling when the
data needed is really all available for sequential index scan.

I'm eager to learn more about it and may be put versioning into the
index rows (or whatever it is.) Who am I to doubt Tom Lane's words
"it won't happen"? But isn't this a very serious conclusion? In any
of this we have that challenge/competition with Oracle in mind, want
it or not. If we want to use PostgreSQL seriously for our medical
record, an "it won't happen" answer can make a huge negative impression
on those I am working with. PostgreSQL for our medical record system
-- it won't happen!? ... Heck no! This can't be the answer!

regards
-Gunther

-- 
Gunther Schadow, M.D., Ph.D.                    gschadow@regenstrief.org
Medical Information Scientist      Regenstrief Institute for Health Care
Adjunct Assistant Professor        Indiana University School of Medicine
tel:1(317)630-7960                         http://aurora.regenstrief.org







view thread (4+ messages)

Message-ID: <3D1B2CE9.3080709@aurora.regenstrief.org>
Permalink:  ../3D1B2CE9.3080709@aurora.regenstrief.org/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/3D1B2CE9.3080709@aurora.regenstrief.org

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
  Cc: gunther@aurora.regenstrief.org, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
  Subject: Re: Possibility of Index-Only access in PostgreSQL?
  In-Reply-To: <3D1B2CE9.3080709@aurora.regenstrief.org>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox