From: Charles H. Woloszynski <chw@clearmetrix.com>
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: High Availability PostgreSQL solution?
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 21:13:24 -0400
Message-ID: <3DB89AB4.4040704@clearmetrix.com> (raw)
[This is a re-post.. my initial attempt seemed to have been lost.
Apologies for any duplication]
We are looking to create a two-machine high-availability configuration
for PostgreSQL. We have been pursuing using something like rserv, but
this appears to be more of a slave sync tool. Actually, this is also
important to us (as we expect we will need to scale to lots of readers
doing queries on the database (we are running datamart of website
performance metrics).
But, rserv (and eRServer, its commercial cousin) dont seem to have a
hot-standby capability at the moment. I have looked through some of the
PostgreSQL archives and I've seen articles about other approaches, but I
mostly see replication engines (which are a good thing, but not what I
am hunting for).
I saw one posting that suggested using a clustered filesystem; is this
an option? Has anyone done postgreSQL on a replicating/clustered file
system with decent performance? Any and all ideas are welcome.
Thanks in advance,
Charlie
--
Charles H. Woloszynski
ClearMetrix, Inc.
115 Research Drive
Bethlehem, PA 18015
tel: 610-419-2210 x400
fax: 240-371-3256
web: www.clearmetrix.com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: chw@clearmetrix.com
Subject: Re: High Availability PostgreSQL solution?
In-Reply-To: <3DB89AB4.4040704@clearmetrix.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox