pg.ddx.io  pgsql-sql@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andras Kutrovics <n-drew@freemail.hu>
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Simple SQL Question
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 10:16:22 +0100
Message-ID: <41908AE6.80202@freemail.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1099678157.39887.15.camel@taz.oficina>
References: <418BB051.6070808@freemail.hu>
	<1099678157.39887.15.camel@taz.oficina>

Franco Bruno Borghesi wrote:


Hi!

Sorry for being late with the answer, I was busy at one of our customer;)

> wouldn't it be easier using offset & limit?: you always select from the 
> table with an itemkey,location order by clause. You save the current 
> offset between requests, and for every request you re-execute the query 
> with a different offset.
   Sure, but sometimes I have to query by name, and dont want to create
   another query component.

> If you still want to go with what you already have, you should keep the 
> lastItemKey and lastLocaltion values between requests, and your where 
> clause should be something like:
> WHERE (itemKey=:lastItemKey AND location>:lastLocation) OR 
> (itemKey>:lastItemKey)

   It works perfectly, but I have to consider the performance issue,
   because if i use 'or' statement, postgres doesn't use index scan,
   and I also have tables with 3 or more keys and 500.000 records , 
where
   the performance of this method is poor.
   Maybe I will end up using limit and offset in case of incremental
   fetching,but if the table is modified between requests, it can behave
   weird.
   Is there a perfect solution to this?

Sorry for the english

Thank you again,

Andras Kutrovics




view thread (19+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <41908AE6.80202@freemail.hu>
Permalink:  ../41908AE6.80202@freemail.hu/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/41908AE6.80202@freemail.hu

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
  Cc: n-drew@freemail.hu
  Subject: Re: Simple SQL Question
  In-Reply-To: <41908AE6.80202@freemail.hu>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox