pg.ddx.io  pgsql-sql@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
To: Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>
Cc: KÖPFERL Robert <robert.koepferl@sonorys.at>
Cc: 'dpandey@secf.com' <dpandey@secf.com>
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org, 'PostgreSQL' <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [SQL] index row size 2728 exceeds btree maximum, 27
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 08:22:20 +0100
Message-ID: <42A0052C.6040505@archonet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050602193324.GA2861@wolff.to>
References: <ED4E30DD9C43D5118DFB00508BBBA76EB16736@neptun.sonorys.at>
	<429EFE55.3050601@archonet.com>
	<20050602163542.GA23150@wolff.to>
	<429F3B21.9020209@archonet.com>
	<20050602193324.GA2861@wolff.to>

Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 18:00:17 +0100,
>   Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com> wrote:
> 
>>Certainly, but if the text in the logfile row is the same, then hashing 
>>isn't going to make a blind bit of difference. That's the root of my 
>>concern, and something only Dinesh knows.
> 
> 
> Sure it is. Because the hash can be used in the primary key instead of
> of the error message which should reduce the size of the key enough
> that he can use a btree index.

Sorry - obviously not being clear. Since he's using the index via a 
primary key he'll need the columns that key is over to be unique. If the 
columns fail that test in the real world, hashing will replace the 
index-size error with an "unable to insert duplicates" error.

-- 
   Richard Huxton
   Archonet Ltd



view thread (18+ messages)

Message-ID: <42A0052C.6040505@archonet.com>
Permalink:  ../42A0052C.6040505@archonet.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/42A0052C.6040505@archonet.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
  Cc: dev@archonet.com, bruno@wolff.to, robert.koepferl@sonorys.at, dpandey@secf.com
  Subject: Re: [SQL] index row size 2728 exceeds btree maximum, 27
  In-Reply-To: <42A0052C.6040505@archonet.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox