From: Markus Schaber <schabi@logix-tt.com>
To: chester c young <chestercyoung@yahoo.com>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: plpgsql triggers in rules
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:01:41 +0100
Message-ID: <43C68B75.3040806@logix-tt.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060101181955.23411.qmail@web54313.mail.yahoo.com>
References: <20060101181955.23411.qmail@web54313.mail.yahoo.com>
Hi, Chester,
chester c young wrote:
> is is possible for to have a "do instead" trigger on a view that is a
> plpgsql function?
Kinda.
They're called "rules", not "triggers". See
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/interactive/rules.html
HTH,
Schabi
--
Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG
Dipl. Inf. | Software Development GIS
Fight against software patents in EU! www.ffii.org www.nosoftwarepatents.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: schabi@logix-tt.com, chestercyoung@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: plpgsql triggers in rules
In-Reply-To: <43C68B75.3040806@logix-tt.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox