From: Mark Dilger <pgsql@markdilger.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Subject: Re: [SQL] Interval subtracting
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 15:43:58 -0800
Message-ID: <440631BE.2050501@markdilger.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16936.1141255433@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <44061060.8080407@markdilger.com>
<200603012145.k21LjRX11928@candle.pha.pa.us>
<44061790.1040302@markdilger.com>
<44062073.9010803@markdilger.com>
<4406262B.4000509@markdilger.com>
<16936.1141255433@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Tom Lane wrote:
> Mark Dilger <pgsql@markdilger.com> writes:
>
>>This overall design seems more flexible than Tom's recent post in which he
>>stated that justify_days should call justify_hours internally.
>
>
> AFAIR I said the exact opposite.
>
> regards, tom lane
Tom Lane also wrote:
> assumption), but justify_days should be changed to be effectively a
> combination of both functions --- that is, it should fix all three
> fields using both the 30days and the 24hours assumptions. Then it could
> guarantee that all come out with the same sign.
How is changing justify days so that it touches the hours field different from
having justify_days call justify_hours?
mark
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql@markdilger.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pgman@candle.pha.pa.us
Subject: Re: [SQL] Interval subtracting
In-Reply-To: <440631BE.2050501@markdilger.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox