pg.ddx.io  pgsql-sql@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Markus Schaber <schabi@logix-tt.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: PostgreSQL SQL List <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Set generating functions and subqueries
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 13:34:23 +0100
Message-ID: <441566CF.2040105@logix-tt.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5142.1142002128@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <44116ED2.9060901@logix-tt.com>
	<5142.1142002128@sss.pgh.pa.us>

Hi, Tom,

Tom Lane wrote:

> The behavior of the subquery expression is dictated by the SQL spec:
> 
>          1) If the cardinality of a <scalar subquery> or a <row subquery> is
>             greater than 1, then an exception condition is raised: cardinal-
>             ity violation.

That's interesting to know, and it seems to be a clean design.

> The fact that the other form is even allowed is more of a holdover from
> PostQUEL than something we have consciously decided is a good idea.
> (IMHO it's actually a fairly *bad* idea, because it does not work nicely
> when there's more than one SRF in the same targetlist.)  It'll probably
> get phased out someday, if we can find a way to replace the
> functionality.  I seem to recall speculating that SQL2003's LATERAL
> tables might do the job.

AFAICS, it can be replaced with JOINs:

select * FROM (SELECT 'othercol' AS other) as foo CROSS JOIN (SELECT
generate_series(1,2) as a) as fop CROSS JOIN (SELECT
generate_series(3,4) as b) AS foq;
  other   | a | b
----------+---+---
 othercol | 1 | 3
 othercol | 2 | 3
 othercol | 1 | 4
 othercol | 2 | 4
(4 rows)

> No kidding.

I wasn't kidding, I just wanted to point out the different behaviour
between equal-length and inequal-length sequences.


Thanks,
markus

-- 
Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG
Dipl. Inf.     | Software Development GIS

Fight against software patents in EU! www.ffii.org www.nosoftwarepatents.org



view thread (4+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <441566CF.2040105@logix-tt.com>
Permalink:  ../441566CF.2040105@logix-tt.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/441566CF.2040105@logix-tt.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
  Cc: schabi@logix-tt.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
  Subject: Re: Set generating functions and subqueries
  In-Reply-To: <441566CF.2040105@logix-tt.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox