pg.ddx.io  pgsql-sql@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick JACQUOT <patrick.jacquot@anpe.fr>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Referential integrity broken (8.0.3), sub-select help
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 10:01:23 +0100
Message-ID: <44211263.5020807@anpe.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060321145839.68211.qmail@web50301.mail.yahoo.com>
References: <20060321145839.68211.qmail@web50301.mail.yahoo.com>

ogjunk-pgjedan@yahoo.com wrote:

>Hello,
>
>I've got 2 tables, "url" (U), and "bookmark" (B), with "bookmark" pointing to "url" via FK.
>Somehow I ended up with some rows in B referencing non-existent rows in U.
>This sounds super strange and dangerous to me, and it's not clear to me how/why PG let this happen.
>I'm using 8.0.3.
>
>Here are the table references I just mentioned:
>
>Table "bookmark":
>     id                  SERIAL
>                         CONSTRAINT pk_bookmark_id PRIMARY KEY
> 
> Table "url":
>    url_id              INTEGER
>                         CONSTRAINT fk_bookmark_id REFERENCES bookmark(id)
>
>  
>
Your DDL  doesn't say :  "B references U", but the contrary : "U 
references B".
So it's perfectly right that somes tuples in B are not referenced by 
tuples in U.
Please correct your constraints.

>Problem #1: Strange that PG allowed this to happen.  Maybe my DDL above allows this to happen and needs to be tightened?  I thought the above would ensure referential integrity, but maybe I need to specify something else?
>
>Problem #2: I'd like to find all rows in B that point to non-existent rows in U.  I can do it with the following sub-select, I believe, but it's rather inefficient (EXPLAIN shows both tables would be sequentially scanned):
>
>  SELECT * FROM bookmark WHERE id NOT IN (SELECT b.id FROM bookmark b, url u WHERE b.url_id=u.id);
>
>Is there a more efficient way to get the rows from "bookmark"?
>
>Thanks,
>Otis
>
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
>
>  
>
I think, for that one Scott's answer is OK
You could also try SELECT * FROM url U WHERE NOT EXISTS(SELECT * FROM 
bookmark B WHERE B.url-id=U.id)
and see wich one is faster



view thread (7+ messages)

Message-ID: <44211263.5020807@anpe.fr>
Permalink:  ../44211263.5020807@anpe.fr/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/44211263.5020807@anpe.fr

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
  Cc: patrick.jacquot@anpe.fr
  Subject: Re: Referential integrity broken (8.0.3), sub-select help
  In-Reply-To: <44211263.5020807@anpe.fr>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox