From: Wiebe Cazemier <halfgaar@gmail.com>
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: unique names in variables and columns in plsql functions
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 23:38:27 +0200
Message-ID: <44285B53.2070809@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060327144804.GV80726@pervasive.com>
References: <4427F7D3.3000103@gmail.com>
<20060327144804.GV80726@pervasive.com>
(Whoops, pressed wrong reply button. Here it is correctly this time.)
On 03/27/06 16:48, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
>
>Sadly, overloading variable names between plpgsql and SQL is *highly*
>problematic. Because of this I *always* prefix plpgsql variables with
>something, such as p_ for parameters and v_ for general variables.
>
>
Hmm. Well, at least now I'm aware of it. Perhaps I will do something
similair to prefixes from now on, it would seem to be good practice.
Attachments:
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 257B) download
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: halfgaar@gmail.com
Subject: Re: unique names in variables and columns in plsql functions
In-Reply-To: <44285B53.2070809@gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox