From: Jean-Paul Argudo <jean-paul@argudo.org>
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Martin Marques <martin@bugs.unl.edu.ar>
Subject: Re: age() vs. timestamp substraction
Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2006 11:35:30 +0200
Message-ID: <45262362.4030101@argudo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <29752.1160073444@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <cbcf271add3140fe7cff8d45f31af585@bugs.unl.edu.ar>
<29752.1160073444@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Hi all,
> Where did you get that idea? age's reference point is current_date (ie,
> midnight) not now(). There are also some differences in the calculation
> compared to a plain timestamp subtraction.
I'm jumping on this thread to point out a little strange thing to me.
CURRENT_DATE, converted (stupidly) as a string *with* hour is "current
date at mid-day":
test=# select to_char(current_date,'YYYY-MM-DD HH:MI:SS');
to_char
---------------------
2006-10-06 12:00:00
(1 ligne)
It was a day when I had to debug a strange behaviour in a customer's
(bad) code :-)
Cheers,
--
Jean-Paul Argudo
www.PostgreSQLFr.org
www.dalibo.com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: jean-paul@argudo.org, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, martin@bugs.unl.edu.ar
Subject: Re: age() vs. timestamp substraction
In-Reply-To: <45262362.4030101@argudo.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox