From: Chris Tennant <postgresql-ctennant@elirious.com>
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: planner used functional index in 7.3.6, now does a seq scan in 7.4.7 after upgrade
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 22:10:53 -0800
Message-ID: <455FF56D.7030001@elirious.com> (raw)
Greetings,
I've just upgraded from 7.3.6 to 7.4.7 (running on Debian Linux). I
dumped and reloaded my db as part of the upgrade. Everything is working
great, except that one query that executed in < 1 ms on 7.3.6 now takes
> 500 ms on 7.4.7. When I look at the query plan, the planner is no
longer taking advantage of a functional index (the index is correctly
defined as immutable), and is doing a sequence scan instead. I'm
stumped -- I can't see any reason why this would be broken. Out of
desperation, I tried dropping and recreating the index, and dropping and
recreating the function. I've also run "ANALYZE" on the tables, in
addition to the regular analysis and vacuums that I run frequently as
part of regular maintenance. No luck.
Has anyone else run into something like this? Any hints would be much
appreciated. FWIW, I've provided all the gory details below.
Thank you!!
Chris
----------------
This is the query:
SELECT
data_stored.id as data_stored_id,
patient_data.id as patient_data_id,
stereo_image_attributes.id as
stereo_id,
stereo_image_attributes.x_offset as
stereo_x_offset,
stereo_image_attributes.y_offset as
stereo_y_offset,
stereo_image_attributes.stereo_swap as
stereo_swap,
stereo_image_attributes.analysis_date as
stereo_analysis_date,
stereo_image_attributes.analysis_detail as
stereo_analysis_detail,
stereo_image_attributes.analysis_storage_id as
stereo_analysis_storage_id
FROM
opt_stereo_pair_image_attributes stereo_image_attributes,
opt_patient_data patient_data,
opt_patient_data_entries patient_data_entry,
opt_patient_data_stored data_stored
WHERE
patient_data.version_id = ? AND
patient_data_entry.patient_data_id = patient_data.id AND
patient_data_entry.id =
data_stored.patient_data_entry_id AND
data_stored.id = stereo_id (
stereo_image_attributes.left_patient_data_stored_id,
stereo_image_attributes.right_patient_data_id
stereo_image_attributes.left_patient_data_id )
I then run EXPLAIN ANALYZE on 7.3.6 and 7.4.7, with the same query
parameter. here's what EXPLAIN ANALYZE yields on 7.3.6. note that it
*is* using the functional index "stereo_pair_image_attributes_stereo_id"
QUERY PLAN
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nested Loop (cost=0.00..5331.34 rows=2 width=64) (actual
time=0.13..0.52 rows=2 loops=1)
-> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..153.23 rows=4 width=20) (actual
time=0.10..0.45 rows=7 loops=1)
-> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..8.52 rows=16 width=12) (actual
time=0.05..0.18 rows=37 loops=1)
-> Index Scan using patient_data_version_id on
opt_patient_data patient_data (cost=0.00..4.75 rows=1 width=4) (actual
time=0.03..0.03 rows=1 loops=1)
Index Cond: (version_id = 323268)
-> Index Scan using opt_patient_data_id_key on
opt_patient_data_entries patient_data_entry (cost=0.00..3.40 rows=30
width=8) (actual time=0.01..0.09 rows=37 loops=1)
Index Cond: (patient_data_entry.patient_data_id =
"outer".id)
-> Index Scan using opt_patient_data_stored_entry_count on
opt_patient_data_stored data_stored (cost=0.00..8.85 rows=2 width=8)
(actual time=0.01..0.01 rows=0 loops=37)
Index Cond: ("outer".id = data_stored.patient_data_entry_id)
-> Index Scan using stereo_pair_image_attributes_stereo_id on
opt_stereo_pair_image_attributes stereo_image_attributes
(cost=0.00..1454.62 rows=451 width=44) (actual time=0.01..0.01 rows=0
loops=7)
Index Cond: ("outer".id =
stereo_id(stereo_image_attributes.left_patient_data_stored_id,
stereo_image_attributes.right_patient_data_id,
stereo_image_attributes.left_patient_data_id))
Total runtime: 0.62 msec
(12 rows)
And then on 7.4.7. note that it is *not* using the functional index,
but is instead doing a seq scan on opt_stereo_pair_image_attributes.
QUERY PLAN
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hash Join (cost=173.16..2628.80 rows=2 width=40) (actual
time=245.433..581.288 rows=2 loops=1)
Hash Cond: (stereo_id("outer".left_patient_data_stored_id,
"outer".right_patient_data_id, "outer".left_patient_data_id) = "inner".id)
-> Seq Scan on opt_stereo_pair_image_attributes
stereo_image_attributes (cost=0.00..1793.21 rows=88321 width=44)
(actual time=0.004..162.218 rows=88321 loops=1)
-> Hash (cost=173.15..173.15 rows=4 width=8) (actual
time=0.709..0.709 rows=0 loops=1)
-> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..173.15 rows=4 width=8) (actual
time=0.114..0.691 rows=7 loops=1)
-> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..8.44 rows=17 width=8)
(actual time=0.042..0.280 rows=37 loops=1)
-> Index Scan using patient_data_version_id on
opt_patient_data patient_data (cost=0.00..4.76 rows=1 width=4) (actual
time=0.019..0.021 rows=1 loops=1)
Index Cond: (version_id = 323268)
-> Index Scan using opt_patient_data_id_key on
opt_patient_data_entries patient_data_entry (cost=0.00..3.35 rows=26
width=8) (actual time=0.013..0.110 rows=37 loops=1)
Index Cond:
(patient_data_entry.patient_data_id = "outer".id)
-> Index Scan using opt_patient_data_stored_entry_count
on opt_patient_data_stored data_stored (cost=0.00..9.66 rows=2 width=8)
(actual time=0.006..0.007 rows=0 loops=37)
Index Cond: ("outer".id =
data_stored.patient_data_entry_id)
Total runtime: 581.390 ms
(13 rows)
Here are the schema details for the table with the functional index:
Table "public.opt_stereo_pair_image_attributes"
Column | Type | Modifiers
------------------------------+-----------------------------+--------------------
id | integer | not null
left_patient_data_stored_id | integer | not null
right_patient_data_stored_id | integer | not null
x_offset | integer | default 0
y_offset | integer | default 0
analysis_date | timestamp without time zone |
analysis_detail | integer |
analysis_storage_id | integer |
stereo_swap | integer | default 0
left_patient_data_id | integer | not null
right_patient_data_id | integer | not null
analysis_type_id | integer | not null
default 0
Indexes:
"opt_stereo_pair_image_attributes_pkey" primary key, btree (id)
"opt_stereo_pair_image_attributes_stereo_key" unique, btree
(left_patient_data_stored_id, right_patient_data_stored_id)
"stereo_pair_image_attributes_stereo_id" btree
(stereo_id(right_patient_data_id, left_patient_data_id))
Foreign-key constraints:
"analysis_type_id" FOREIGN KEY (analysis_type_id) REFERENCES
opt_analysis_types(id)
"left_patient_data_id" FOREIGN KEY (left_patient_data_id) REFERENCES
opt_patient_data(id)
"right_patient_data_id" FOREIGN KEY (right_patient_data_id)
REFERENCES opt_patient_data(id)
"opt_stereo_pair_image_attributes_right_patient_data_stored" FOREIGN
KEY (right_patient_data_stored_id) REFERENCES opt_patient_data_stored(id)
"opt_stereo_pair_image_attributes_left_patient_data_stored" FOREIGN
KEY (left_patient_data_stored_id) REFERENCES opt_patient_data_stored(id)
here's the definition of the function (as immutable):
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION stereo_id (INTEGER, INTEGER, INTEGER) RETURNS
INTEGER AS
'BEGIN RETURN CASE WHEN $2 = $3 THEN $1 ELSE -1 END; END;'
LANGUAGE 'plpgsql' IMMUTABLE;
and here's the original definition of the functional index:
CREATE INDEX stereo_pair_image_attributes_stereo_id
ON opt_stereo_pair_image_attributes
(stereo_id(right_patient_data_id,left_patient_data_id));
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: postgresql-ctennant@elirious.com
Subject: Re: planner used functional index in 7.3.6, now does a seq scan in 7.4.7 after upgrade
In-Reply-To: <455FF56D.7030001@elirious.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox