pg.ddx.io  pgsql-sql@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
To: Chris Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Database Synchronization
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 16:43:17 +0100
Message-ID: <469E3515.4070006@archonet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <60fy3ln4ij.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com>
References: <002d01c7c90b$48870560$d9951020$@com>
	<469DC124.8000704@archonet.com>
	<60fy3ln4ij.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com>

Chris Browne wrote:
> dev@archonet.com (Richard Huxton) writes:
>>
>> http://www.slony.info/

> But it is worth noting one thing about the synchronization...
> 
> Slony-I's strategy is pretty simple: One node is considered the
> "master," and the other node is forcibly made to conform to what is on
> the master.
> 
> If you want to synchronize back and forth (e.g. - multimaster
> replication of some sort), Slony-I is not suitable...

Except in the case when you can have separate tables for the data. If 
you have a london_sales table only updated in London and a paris_sales 
table only updated in Paris then you have something inching towards 
multi-master.

-- 
   Richard Huxton
   Archonet Ltd



view thread (17+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <469E3515.4070006@archonet.com>
Permalink:  ../469E3515.4070006@archonet.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/469E3515.4070006@archonet.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
  Cc: dev@archonet.com, cbbrowne@acm.org
  Subject: Re: Database Synchronization
  In-Reply-To: <469E3515.4070006@archonet.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox