From: Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
To: Kitter Georgiy <sql4-en@narod.ru>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Request into several DBMS simultaneously on DDL and DML
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 08:58:27 +0100
Message-ID: <46D3D5A3.6050503@archonet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <195471188276289@webmail10.yandex.ru>
References: <195471188276289@webmail10.yandex.ru>
Kitter Georgiy wrote:
> (1)Let's allow to __connect into several DBMS__ at once,
> last of them becomes DBMS 'by default'.
...
> It's necessary to not signalize about break of foreign key,
> if remote database will not connected in next time.
But that's the vital bit. Without being able to extend relational
integrity checks across database boundaries you're not really getting
something that's general-use.
Without that it's not really worth extending syntax - dblink() offers a
solution to the limited cases available.
If you manage to come up with an efficient multi-master replication
system though, please let us know :-)
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: dev@archonet.com, sql4-en@narod.ru
Subject: Re: Request into several DBMS simultaneously on DDL and DML
In-Reply-To: <46D3D5A3.6050503@archonet.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox