From: Paul Lambert <paul.lambert@autoledgers.com.au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-sql <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Quick question re foreign keys.
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 11:09:27 +0800
Message-ID: <471EB767.5040009@autoledgers.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <471EB55F.5050600@autoledgers.com.au>
References: <471EA7D5.9040403@autoledgers.com.au>
<21715.1193193880@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<471EB55F.5050600@autoledgers.com.au>
Paul Lambert wrote:
>
> It's marked not null as a result of being part of the primary key for
> that table which I can't really get around.
>
> I can get away with not having the foreign key though, so I'll have to
> go down that path.
>
> Cheers,
> P.
>
Ignore this whole thread actually.
I need to rethink some of my design.
--
Paul Lambert
Database Administrator
AutoLedgers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: paul.lambert@autoledgers.com.au, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
Subject: Re: Quick question re foreign keys.
In-Reply-To: <471EB767.5040009@autoledgers.com.au>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox