From: Rob Sargent <robjsargent@gmail.com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Cc: Nathaniel Smith <nate@summersault.com>
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [SQL] Data audit trail techniques in postgresql
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 14:30:33 -0600
Message-ID: <4A96ECE9.4030409@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090827193215.GL11213@alvh.no-ip.org>
References: <20090827122831.7a780cdb@gibson.summersault.com>
<20090827173617.GK11213@alvh.no-ip.org>
<4A96D0FB.5010609@gmail.com>
<20090827193215.GL11213@alvh.no-ip.org>
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Rob Sargent escribió:
>
>> tablelog doesn't appear any more lively than the OPs audittrail2.
>>
>
> Perhaps, but I have heard of people using it successfully recently,
> whereas Nathaniel reported that audittrail2 seems to have obvious bugs.
>
>
Fair enough.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: robjsargent@gmail.com, alvherre@commandprompt.com, nate@summersault.com, pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [SQL] Data audit trail techniques in postgresql
In-Reply-To: <4A96ECE9.4030409@gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox