From: Gerardo Herzig <gherzig@fmed.uba.ar>
To: postgres list <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>
Subject: about pg_proc (column pronamespace)
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 14:57:46 -0300
Message-ID: <4AAA8F9A.2040903@fmed.uba.ar> (raw)
i all. Looking for a way to change some functions to 'security
definer'. This is only going to happen in some of the schemas.I found
that pg_catalog.pg_proc have a bool column (prosecdef), which contains
if some function is defined as 'security definer'. So good. It also
contains a column named pronamespace, which contains (or should) the
schema.
After this
SELECT distinct pronamespace from pg_catalog.pg_proc;
pronamespace
--------------
11
2200
11313
1901391
1901393
1901396
1901397
1901398
1901399
i would say that, in pg_catalog.pg_namespace i should be able to found
the schema for a particular function. But nope:
glyms_f_test=# SELECT * from pg_catalog.pg_namespace ;
nspname | nspowner | nspacl
--------------------+----------+-------------------------------------
pg_catalog | 10 | {postgres=UC/postgres,=U/postgres}
pg_toast | 10 |
pg_temp_1 | 10 |
pg_toast_temp_1 | 10 |
information_schema | 10 | {postgres=UC/postgres,=U/postgres}
[snip]
public | 10 | {postgres=UC/postgres,=UC/postgres}
(15 rows)
Obviously im missing something, i cant find any relation between
pg_proc.pronamespace and pg_namespace.
Im using PG 8.3.5 (Also tested in 8.2.5 with same results)
Any hints?
Thanks!
Gerardo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: gherzig@fmed.uba.ar
Subject: Re: about pg_proc (column pronamespace)
In-Reply-To: <4AAA8F9A.2040903@fmed.uba.ar>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox